Advertising
 
Posted by: John Brace | 10th December 2014

Cllr Phil Davies agrees to £2.4 million of cuts for 2015-16 in 10 areas of Wirral Council expenditure

Cabinet (Wirral Council) 8th December 2014 Background Shirley Hudspeth, Surjit Tour, Cllr Phil Davies & Graham Burgess foreground trade union representative Agenda item 4 Council Budget Consultation Findings

Cabinet (Wirral Council) 8th December 2014 Background Shirley Hudspeth, Surjit Tour, Cllr Phil Davies & Graham Burgess foreground trade union representative Agenda item 4 Council Budget Consultation Findings

Cabinet (Wirral Council) 8th December 2014 Background Shirley Hudspeth, Surjit Tour, Cllr Phil Davies & Graham Burgess foreground trade union representative Agenda item 4 Council Budget Consultation Findings

Cllr Phil Davies agrees to £2.4 million of cuts for 2015-16 in 10 areas of Wirral Council expenditure

                                                   

Future Council Wirral logo

Future Council Wirral logo

                                                   

The Cabinet meeting on 8th December was well attended for the item on the recent “Future Council” budget consultation. £4 million of cuts were consulted on, of which £2.5 million would need to be chosen.

However minutes before that item was decided, Cabinet approved an ten-year extension to Biffa’s contract. This extended the contract from 2017 to 2027, which meant Cabinet then only had to find £2.4 million of cuts. This was because Biffa had offered a £500,000 reduction in 2015-16 in what they charge for services under the contract in return for the ten-year extension and changes to the contract. Yes, before anybody points it out I realise that £2.5 million – £500,000 = £2 million, not £2.4 million. As to what the other £400,000 saved on the Biffa contract will be used towards I’m unsure (maybe it’ll go towards the projected overspend this year)!

So what have the Labour Cabinet decided to cut? For the detail on what each of these budget options refers to you can read this blog post written at the start of the Future Council consultation that details what each budget options means. The West Kirby Marine Lake budget option has changed from transferring it to the private sector to an alternative budget option for it involving better marketing/increased income. These are each of the budget proposals they accepted in full, which as the Cabinet has to refer budget recommendations to Council to decide won’t be implemented yet.

Budget Options accepted in full
Council Tax Over 70s Discount £600,000
Allotments, Bowling and Football £35,000
Parking at Fort Perch Rock £25,000
Commemorations and Memorials £100,000
Litter and Dog Fouling Enforcement £70,000
All Age Disability Service £600,000
West Kirby Marine Lake £25,000
Girtrell Court £385,000

Total: £1.84 million

Budget Options accepted in part
Community Libraries £190,000 (originally £411,000)
Preventative Maintenance £370,000 (originally £570,000)

Total: £560,000

Grand Total: £2.4 million

Here’s what they chose not to cut in full (I’m leaving out the two options below of community libraries and preventative maintenance where partial savings were agreed as they are already mentioned above):

Budget options not chosen – these savings will not be made in 2015-16
Parking in Countryside Parks £50,000
Public Conveniences £140,000
Cold Calling Zones £80,000
Roadside Grit Bins £55,000
School Crossing Patrols £90,000
Pest Control £65,000
Youth and Play £450,000

Total: £930,000

+ part of savings from community libraries (£221,000) and
+ part of savings from Preventative Maintenance (£200,000)

Total: £1.351 million

So how does this compare to a prediction I made before this decision was made last night as to what would be cut?

Well I was correct on most of what the Cabinet chose. However I had to make my total reach £2.5 million as that was what was consulted on rather than the £2.4 million decided last night. The majority of the cuts (Over 70s Council Tax discount, Girtrell Court and All Age Disability Service which total about £1.5 million) I was right on.

The rest I was mainly right on with part of the error caused by having to make it total £2.5 million. However it’s still up to Council to debate them before a final decision is made. However with a Labour majority on Wirral Council it looks almost certain that Cllr Phil Davies will get his budget options approved.

Oh and in slightly related news, Cllr Phil Davies also confirmed his intention to not raise Council Tax in 2015-16 too and accept a Council Tax Freeze Grant (which is part of the reason why some of these cuts have to be made). You can answer why you think Cllr Phil Davies, with Cabinet responsibility for the budget who is up for election in May 2015 doesn’t want to put Council Tax up in 2015-16 in the comments if you wish.

If you click on any of these buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people. Thanks:


Responses

  1. Why is no one asking why there needs to be cuts at all? Mr Davies has 9 Million he was able to hang on too from the Failed Merger with Chester and Cheshire West. Where is that Money? and I know he had it because his Acting CEO made it clear to him that there was no need for Cuts (Published in the Wirral Globe).

    • Which shared services project with CWAC are you referring to? One was supposed to save money, but got cancelled after hundreds of thousands of pounds was spent by Wirral Council and CWAC on it.

      The other one is still in the process of being set up. When is the article you are referring to? The last time Wirral had an Acting CEO was prior to Graham Burgess taking up his post in September 2012 wasn’t it? Therefore any quotes from 2012 would’ve been about then, not now. Back then the budget assumptions were based on Council Tax going up too.. but the politicians changed their minds…

      • At this moment in time, I will not answer your remarks, as there are a number of matters outstanding, which I am in the process of clearing up. However you are quite right about 2012 and C.T. I will return to this matter sometime in the Future. As for the Comments in the Globe, they are there and I have them in my possession, as I retain all paperwork.

  2. Who is Responsible for the Loss of Two Public Buildings? and the Loss of approximately £100,000 (Approximately Value of the two Buildings). Who is responsible for Mr Griffiths 2.8 Million Pounds loss to the People claim? Who is Responsible for all other Losses? it is not the people of Wirral. They’re only Consulted on how to make the cuts afterwards.

    • Who knows? However the Cabinet Member with responsibility to the public for that area is Cllr Adrian Jones.

  3. I believe you may have answered your own question in relation to Election and Council Tax Rise and who provided the Grant to avoid him Raising the Council Tax?, Central Government. Whilst I appreciate he may have to have decreased spending or made savings on certain things, which/that he would have known about or his employed Staff telling him. Why have a Public Consultation on where to make those Savings?

    • Because it’s a legal requirement to consult before making changes. If you made the changes without consulting first, it would cast doubt on legality of the decision.

  4. G’day John

    So “Phil the Dill” is up for it in May.

    I bet that bloke from The Raving Loony Party will vote for him as I have no doubts they live in the same part of Wirral.

    You know him who said that Big, ISUS and Working Neighbourhoods was the worst scandal he had seen in his forty years in local government.

    He then had the audacity to say that “Highbrow” should apologise.

    Has he been sectioned yet mate?

    I bet he didn’t go in a casino in Reno……..

    Ooroo

    James

    Ps He was too busy looking for someone with a scouse accent.

    • Yes Cllr Phil Davies’s term of office as a councillor comes to an end in May. I won’t know if he’s standing for re-election until nearer the time of next year’s elections.

      At this stage I think it’s assumed he will.


Categories