What was in the due diligence report to Wirral Council councillors about a proposed £26 million loan to developers for the Hoylake Golf Resort?
In late June I made an information request to Wirral Council for the reports to councillors that had later led to the Cabinet decision against a £26 million loan to the Nicklaus Joint Venture Group. I received no reply. In early September I asked Wirral Council again to do a review as to why this request hadn’t been responded to. Again no reply.
A fortnight ago I flagged this up with ICO (the Information Commissioner’s Office who are the regulator) and yesterday Wirral Council provided (albeit in parts redacted) 56 A4 pages of information (although some are blank or duplicate pages).
The first ten pages are a report of Shaer Halewood to the cross-party Business Overview and Scrutiny Committee. This Committee discussed their recommendation to Cabinet about whether to make a £26 million loan to the Nicklaus Joint Venture Group in private on the 27th June 2019 (see video below).
Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.
If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.
Business Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Wirral Council) 27th June 2019
Their unanimous decision was to recommend to Cabinet not to go ahead with the loan.
Cabinet decided to agree with their recommendation not to loan the developer £26 million at a special meeting on the 8th July 2019 (see below).
Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.
If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.
Cabinet (Wirral Council) 8th July 2019
However pages 11-56 of what was released yesterday includes a “Strictly Confidential” due diligence report to councillors about the Hoylake Golf Resort (or Celtic Manor Resort) project. The due diligence report was about the Funding and Phasing Plan in relation to the loan decision.
If I have read the report correctly (see page 22 and 2.19) it appears that the company that is Wirral Council’s auditor (Grant Thornton) also did work for the Nicklaus Joint Venture Group in preparing the Funding and Phasing Plan that was submitted to Wirral Council.
The report also reveals that “McCarthy and Stone” are part of the project as an “apartment partner”.
In relation to the controversial matter of the proposed new link road running through the greenbelt and who pays for it (Wirral Council have already asked the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority and been turned down) it appears a request has been made to central government for the £millions it would cost.
By the timetable in the due diligence report a planning application is expected next year in March 2020.
Other than that – the released information puts more detail in the public domain about this controversial project. Especially as since May 2019 the constituency committees have been abolished so there has been less opportunity for the public to ask questions.
The information revealed also highlighted proposed changes to the existing development agreement between Wirral Council and the Nicklaus Joint Venture Group. The aims of the one of the proposed changes were to reduce SDLT (Stamp Duty Land Tax) liabilities.
If you click on any of the buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people.
As Wirral Council is already £7 to £12 million over budget so far for this year, so next year they will be making more cuts, [ is there anything left to cut?] how can they have £26 million lying around to lend?
We need to do away with Council’s
Thanks for your comment.
The vast majority of the £26 million was going to be borrowed money (I think around £24 million) and would be from their capital budget (rather than the revenue budget which has the projected £7-12 million projected overspend).
Thanks again John, for your tenacious efforts revealing the covert operations of our ‘transparent’ council under the Davies reign.
When you read a document like this, it confirms what I aways expected from Davies and his band of subservient drones.
This inane idea was always sold to us with ‘consultation’ and promises we would be listened to! But the contents of the report paint a different picture, entirely.
Everything in the document points to a fait accompli scenario. The plan is going ahead, with even the planning process treated as a small hurdle. So how the hell did Davies think his ‘consultation’ process would work?
Obviously, there stood a man, surrounded by people who did not challenge or question his leadership. Clearly, he existed within his own Brighton Street eco-system where “yes” was the only reply he would hear.
Asking the people outside of his Brighton Street club what they thought was perhaps, a protocol of inconvenience. It didn’t matter if we didn’t like it, we were getting it! Basically, what Kevin Adderley told the public meeting at Melrose Avenue in Hoylake.
This document is a damning testament to the toxic tenure of the Davies years, in as much as it represents his bulldozing “we know better” attitude over the challengers to his vanity project.
The fact that we have not rolled over to have our collective bellies scratched by the almighty hand of WBC Cabinet was perhaps, the reality check Davies & Co. were not expecting.