Posted by: John Brace | 31 July 2014

EXCLUSIVE: Planning Inspector Griffiths refuses appeal for 10 houses in greenbelt near Storeton Woods

EXCLUSIVE: Planning Inspector Griffiths refuses appeal for 10 houses in greenbelt near Storeton Woods


Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.

YouTube privacy policy

If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.

Planning Appeal to OUT/13/01259 Land adjacent Marsh Lane Higher Bebington CH63 5PP Part 2 Committee Room 2, Wallasey Town Hall, 23rd July 2014

In an update to a story about an informal planning appeal hearing held at Wallasey Town Hall last week the Planning Inspectorate have made their decision to refuse the appeal. The site is currently a paddock with stables next to Storeton Woods.

The original grounds Wirral Council planning officers had given for refusing the application were inappropriate development in the greenbelt, highway safety and the effect it would have on trees covered by a tree protection order. The main issue for Planning Inspector Griffiths to consider was whether ten houses on this site (planning permission has already been given for conversion of the existing stables to three houses) was inappropriate development in the greenbelt.

On highway safety grounds, Inspector Griffiths disagreed with Wirral Council officers and local residents, as he regarded the extra traffic would not be significant. The Appellant had proposed moving a sandstone wall with an adjacent property to provide an access road to the ten houses. However in the Planning Inspector’s decision he stated this “would complicate and disrupt the continuous linear nature of the sandstone wall in an injurious fashion”.

The trees on the appeal site, which were protected by a tree protection order, were also referred to in the decision as “attractive features that contribute positively to the area.” He also felt it wasn’t clear that the moving of the sandstone wall for the access road could be done without resulting in the loss of trees.

Erecting ten houses (with gardens) on the site with an access road would affect the openness of the greenbelt permanently. In conclusion the Planning Inspector stated that “the proposal would have a harmful impact on the character and appearance of the area” and would “conflict with UDP Policy HS4 that requires proposals for new housing development not to result in detrimental change in the character of an area, amongst other things, and UDP Policy GR7 that, in simple terms, seeks to protect trees.”

There was a long discussion at the end of the hearing about housing land supply. The Council’s position was that it had a six-year supply of deliverable housing sites (or five years with a 20% buffer). The Appellant, using figures from the previous Regional Spatial Strategy instead said that the Council could only demonstrate a four-year supply or three and a half-year supply with a 20% buffer. The inspector commented on the housing land supply in his decision “Against that overall background, and on the basis of the evidence before me, it is difficult to reach a definitive view as to whether or not the Council can demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites.”

In conclusion the Planning Inspector stated that even if Wirral Council couldn’t prove a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites, that the provision of ten houses on the site along with highway improvements weren’t enough to outweigh the harm caused by inappropriate development in the greenbelt. Therefore the appeal didn’t constitute the “very special circumstances” for development in the greenbelt and was refused.

If you click on any of the buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people.


  1. […] You can read what the planning inspector’s decision was and why he made it in EXCLUSIVE: Planning Inspector Griffiths refuses appeal for 10 houses in greenbelt near Storeton Wood…. […]

  2. G’day John (Tarrantino with swinging, swivelling, all singing and dancing tripod)

    Sorry to hijack this blog about cousin Griffo.

    I leave this Godforsaken country on Saturday and could not go without saying Ooroo to you and your good lady.

    I will fly back for the October Big, ISUS and Working Neighbourhoods meeting.

    Just before I go I must say they never fail to amuse;

    “Phill the Dill” strikes again before “King Joe” of Liverpuddle beheads him.

    The Globe

    “Wirral Council leader recognised after helping Wirral to become ‘the fastest improving council’ in country.”

    The LGA would have about as much clout and effectiveness as the Improvement Board would you suggest?



    Ps Have you read the 526 pages yet?

    Pps Keep up the great work of keeping the lying, cheating barstards amongst them (you know who they are) with no contracts honest.

    • The Improvement Board was made up of people from the LGA (for example councillor peers for each group, a Chief Executive Peer (who was Graham Burgess) etc) with the rest being from Wirral Council.

      Yes I have read the 526 pages yet, but with the DCLG report expected before the October meeting and the adjourned bit of the meeting yet to happen, it makes more sense to write about it nearer the time.

      “Wirral Council leader recognised after helping Wirral to become ‘the fastest improving council’ in country.”

      I wonder if filming public meetings has something to do with this as no doubt with more people outside the room knowing what’s going on it put pressure on the politicians to pull their socks up and sort things out…

      You’ll be glad to know I’ve requested to inspect contracts and invoices as part of the current audit, I’ll probably be going to look at the first batch in the next week or two. I wonder what I will find?