Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.
If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.
Council (Wirral Council) 14th October 2013 Questions to the Leader (Cllr Phil Davies)
The Council meeting started with a one minute silence for the late Sylvia Hodrien and Jim Edwards. There were prayers for councillors after which the Mayor invited people to sit down.
1. Declarations of Interest 3:52
Cllrs Rennie, Niblock, Roberts and Stapleton declared a personal interest in item 11 (Recommendation from the Regeneration and Environment Policy and Performance Committee) as Wirral Council’s representatives on the Mersey Fire and Rescue Authority.
The Mayor gave apologies for Cllr Pat Williams. He asked if there were any further apologies? Cllr Chris Blakeley gave apologies for Cllr Leah Fraser.
Cllr Les Rowlands presented a petition of seventy-four households opposed to the proposal to sell off public land on the corner of Boundary Lane and Telegraph Road.
Cllr Stuart Kelly presented a petition of a hundred and eight residents asking for improvements to the lighting on the pathway from the Holmlands area to Woodchurch High School and Woodchurch Leisure Centre.
Cllr Philip Brightmore presented a petition of two hundred and thirty-seven households asking for something (sadly the rest of what Cllr Brightmore said about that petition was unclear).
Cllr Pat Hackett presented a petition of one hundred and eight people from the Field Road Residents Association in New Brighton objecting to the Council selling a car park.
The Mayor informed the Council that he had not received any requests from the public for questions.
5. Minutes 6:28
The minutes of the Council meetings held on the 15th July and the 19th September were agreed as correct.
6. Leader’s, Executive Members’ and Policy and Performance Committee Chairs Reports 7:30
The Mayor invited the Leader of the Council to introduce his report. Cllr Phil Davies said that his report covered five main areas. These areas were the future Council model and vision, the Budget, European funding (Wirral Council were going to submit a judicial review on this matter), the progress of the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority application and his recent visit to China.
Cllr Jeff Green asked the first question to Cllr Phil Davies. His question was, “Given the Council’s Budget position, as set out in this report, is the Leader of the Council aware of the rumours circulating around a £48,000 compensation payment made to a serving Council officer and does he know what that payment was for?”
Cllr Denise Roberts asked, “Would the Leader of the Council join with me in congratulating the Chancellor of the Exchequer for following Wirral’s example by leading a trade delegation to China and declaring he wants Britain to share in China’s economic progress?”
Cllr Stuart Kelly asked, “In the Leader’s report he talks about working in partnership with strategic partners such as business. At the Council meeting on the 15th July, the Leader will recall that I asked him whether he was aware that the policy of payments to small and medium-sized enterprises within five days was being quietly abandoned by officers. In his reply to me in July, the Leader was clear that the policy had not been abandoned by him or the Administration but also does he recall in his answer saying that he had and I quote ‘asked for a report to be presented to the Cabinet by the Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment detailing what support is in place to ensure SMEs continue to survive and grow which would include information regarding payment times’? I’d ask the Leader Mr Mayor what has happened to that report and how is Council performing against the five-day payment times?”
Cllr Chris Blakeley asked, “My question is about the visit to China. Mr Mayor, we’re informed a key theme of the latest visit was to develop educational links between the young people of Wirral and the young people of China. Can the Leader of the Council tell us why that key theme does not appear in his report because he’s covered everything else (developing education links)? Mr Mayor, I think I … to update councillors on the status of the gifts that travelled halfway round the world and back.”
Cllr Stuart Wittingham asked, “Can I express my thanks to all those involved in organising the second Wirral Council annual conference which was held at the Floral Pavilion on Saturday? Can I ask the Leader of the Council to emphasise the importance of all elected Members to engage in the discussion about developing a model and vision of how the Council operates in future?”
Cllr Andrew Hodson asked, “I was delighted to read of the ongoing progress of the Wirral Waters site and will he be joining me in congratulating Esther McVey on her recent promotion as Employment Minister and place on record his thanks to her for her endeavours to secure Enterprise Zone status for Wirral Waters?”
Cllr Mark Johnston asked, “My question is in relation to point five in the report and the International Trade Centre. Firstly I would like to applaud the Council for its outward looking approach to inward investment, however I note that all three party leaders have all been out to Taicang, China on separate visits. My question relates to the progress on the recommendations made under a scrutiny review looking at the International Trade Centre, especially the agreement reached to explore a cross party working party to make sure the recommendations were carried through. I haven’t seen any progress on that yet, thank you.”
The Mayor asked the Leader of the Council, Cllr Phil Davies to answer those questions.
Continues at Council (Wirral Council) 14th October 2013 Answers to Questions to the Leader (Cllr Phil Davies).
If you click on any of these buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people. Thanks:
14 thoughts on “Council (Wirral Council) 14th October 2013 Questions to the Leader (Cllr Phil Davies)”
As reported today they won’t ‘cough’ on the £48k ‘bung’,where is the Transparency we heard so much abvout?
And are they selling the car park because it isn’t cost effective to raise any revenue from it?
Cllr Davies’ short answer to the question about the £48,000 payment was, “Cllr Green has asked me about rumours circulating errm etc, errm I’ve got nothing to add to the err err email of the Chief Executive issued to all Members of the Council on the 7th October.”
So make of that what you will!
I don’t know the details at present about which car park in New Brighton the petition was against Wirral Council selling off so can’t answer your question.
If the Council leader has ‘nothing more to add to the CEO’s email” that is a NOTHING answer. He either KNOWS or he doesn’t know.
If he knows, then he tells us, the public.
If he doesn’t know, then he uses his position to find out what the hell the CEO is hiding from him, exposes it and removes him from his post forthwith.
You are right that the answer of Cllr Phil Davies doesn’t make much sense to anyone who won’t have had sight of the Chief Executive’s email of the 7th October. I quote below two tweets from Liam Murphy which refer to the email of the Chief Executive.
More nonsense… as we ALL know to our cost, they don’t DO “moral”
I do notice two articles about it in the newspapers today, Wirral Council leader silent on pay out rumour” (Liverpool Daily Post by Liam Murphy and ‘Veil of secrecy’ over Wirral Council payout rumours (Wirral Globe by Leigh Marles).
but officers are not members are they. Only councillors are members I believed. Is Mr Burgess making a deliberate slip here and thereby not really answering the question?
Members are councillors are not they, and officers is officers or staff. to say no compromise agreements based upon members’ behaviour does not cover this story as was it not one officer bullying another officer? Could it be that Mr Burgess is not answering the questions at all?
Yes Members = councillors and officers = employees. I’m not sure of the facts of the matter as to what was alleged, but a range of employment related issues were delegated permanently to the Chief Executive to make arrangements for following a decision of the Cabinet just before Christmas last year.
The draft minutes are up on the Wirral website for this meeting of full council.
We could have predicted this I suppose but……….
……..there is absolutely no sign of anybody asking anything about any £48,000 sum paid to any senior officer. Maybe it was all a collective figment of our imaginations? Has the “Improvement” Board fallen down on the job again?
Can anybody intervene before history is rewritten and the draft minutes are accepted as a “CORRECT RECORD”.
My God, the stench is becoming overpowering……….. :(((((
It is in the minutes, at 33, 8th bullet point down.
Ah, it’s been massaged almost out of existence.
o Reference to “rumours circulating around” – GONE.
o Context given of the need to slash budget by £27.5 million – DISAPPEARED.
o £48,000 figure – VANISHED.
o Identity of person asking this question – NOT INDICATED.
No wonder I missed it. I won’t be the only one either………………….
= NO SCANDAL. ALL’s WELL. Move along now……. nothing to see….. at the next full council meeting, these minutes will be approved as a ‘correct record’.
As ever, the machinations are unimpeded, and in full flow……………..
I’ve also had to appeal this related FoI request to the ICO today. Check back much, much, much later for answers folks !
Comments are closed.