Planning Committee – 21/6/2011 – Part 2 – APP/11/ 00065 – Townfield Close, Claughton – Demolition of an existing petrol filling station and erection of Class A1 retail unit

The report for this item APP/11/00065 – Townfield Close, Claughton – Demolition of an existing petrol filling station and erection of Class A1 retail unit can be read by clicking on the link. The following amendments were also circulated with the agenda:- 6. APP/11/0065 – Townfield Close Claughton – Demolition of a Petrol Filling Station … Continue reading “Planning Committee – 21/6/2011 – Part 2 – APP/11/ 00065 – Townfield Close, Claughton – Demolition of an existing petrol filling station and erection of Class A1 retail unit”

The report for this item APP/11/00065 – Townfield Close, Claughton – Demolition of an existing petrol filling station and erection of Class A1 retail unit can be read by clicking on the link.

The following amendments were also circulated with the agenda:-

6. APP/11/0065 – Townfield Close Claughton – Demolition of a Petrol Filling Station and erection of Class A1 retail unit.

– One additional representation of support has been received.

– Two additional representations of objection have been received including a report from Bradburn and Co. Accountants, detailing projected accounts for the Post Office within Townfield Close, in the event that the Post Office had to bear the costs of supporting the entire premises costs (currently shared with Premier) and expressing concern over safety in relation to delivery vehicles.

– Additional conditions:

13. The occupation of this development authorised by this permission shall not begin until the improvement works shown on drawing SK 21010-02 have been completed in accordance with those drawings and have been certified as complete by or on behalf of the local planning authority and shall be retained as such thereafter.

Reason: In the interests of road safety and maintain access for delivery vehicles.

14. A scheme of works to restrict the lay-by shown on SK21010-02 for “delivery vehicles only” shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of development. The scheme shall be implement prior to first opening of the store and retained as such thereafter.

Reason: In the interests of road safety and to maintain access for delivery vehicles.

15. No deliveries shall take place at the site between the hours of 08.30 and 09.30 or between the hours of 15:00 and 16:00 from Monday to Friday inclusive.

Reason: In the interests of sustainable transport and highway safety.

16. Prior to development commencing a scheme of works to prohibit parking at all times within Townfield Close shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority along with a management plan. The scheme of works shall be implemented prior to first opening of the store and shall be retained as such thereafter, and operated in accordance with the approved management plan.

Reason: In the interests of road safety and to maintain access for delivery vehicles.

Planning Committee – 21/6/2011 – Part 1 – Introductions, application for a store in Noctorum

Present: Chair (Cllr Elderton), Cllr Mitchell, Cllr Clements, Cllr Hayes (Paul), Cllr Boult, Cllr Johnson, Cllr Kenny, Cllr Mooney, Cllr Realey and Cllr Kelly.

The meeting started with the Chair apologising for the meeting starting over five minutes late. He welcomed everyone to the meeting and asked those present (including officers) to introduce themselves.

He then asked for declarations of interest or party whip. None were declared. The minutes of the last meeting were agreed. Cllr Boult asked why an application had not been received (in reference to the minutes). The Chair thanked Cllr Boult for his question and said he would arrange for it to be handed out. Cheryl Barry said she would make sure it was done. The minutes were agreed.

Site visits were requested by Cllr Hayes for item 14 (APP/11/00449 – 24 Dibbinsdale Road, Bromborough – Rear 1st floor extension) and item 18 (APP/11/00449 – 24 Dibbinsdale Road, Bromborough – Rear 1st floor extension). This was agreed, so site visits will be arranged and the items deferred to another meeting for a decision. The Chair made it clear to anybody present that decisions on these items would not be made until then.

The Chair then asked for permission to rearrange the order of business to reflect the numbers of members of the public present. This was agreed and the first item to be considered was item 6 on the agenda – APP/11/ 00065 – Townfield Close, Claughton – Demolition of an existing petrol filling station and erection of Class A1 retail unit.

Application for a takeaway (refused) – 46 Hoylake Road, Bidston & APP/11/ 00065 – Townfield Close, Claughton – Demolition of an existing petrol filling station and erection of Class A1 retail unit

Following a petition and an objection, the application for a takeaway at 46 Hoylake Road, Bidston which can be viewed on this map here has been turned down.

The reason given for refusal is below:-

" The proposal is within 40 metres of a residential dwelling located within a designated Primarily Residential Area and is considered to present potential for noise and disturbance to the amenities that the occupiers of neighbouring uses can reasonably expect to enjoy. The proposal is thereby contrary to Policy HS15 and SH4 of the adopted Wirral Unitary Development Plan and the associated Supplementary Planning Document 3 - Hot Food Takeaways, Restaurants, Cafes and Drinking Establishments. "

Once again it shows that when residents stand up against unwelcome developments in their local area, Wirral Council will turn down applications. I hope however in the near future that this empty shop (and the one next door to it) will be brought back into use.

The detail of the planning application can be read here.

At tonight’s Planning Committee meeting (starting at 6pm in Committee Room 1/2 at Wallasey Town Hall) another planning application unwanted by local residents is on the agenda, which is application APP/11/00065 for the demolition of existing petrol filling station and erection of a Class A1 retail unit. The report suggest to councillors that they should approve this application, despite the petition from over a thousand households against it. Certainly it will be the most well attended and debated item on tonight’s agenda. Interestingly (and unusually) the application has a qualifying petition for and against the proposal.

Health and Well Being Overview and Scrutiny Committee – 20/6/2011 – Part 4

The minutes were agreed.

Cllr Glasman proposed Cllr Roberts as Vice-Chair. This was seconded by Cllr Doughty. There were no other nominations so Cllr Roberts was elected as Vice-Chair.

Cllr Glasman said that Dr Mantgani wanted to speak to the vascular surgery review, so the agenda was rearranged and item 6 brought forward.

The person introducing the report said he had come in March and this was an update on progress. In respect of what he’d said in March there had been public and professional engagement. There had been meetings for public and staff as well as a consultation document and internet survey. There was a tension between providing services locally and a higher volume less locally. The consultation had gathered views on patient safety and local access. An arterial centre would be recommended to the Project Board. He also referred to a meeting with the GP consortia.

The recommendation to the Project Board would be on the collaborative proposal of Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and the Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust. He was delighted to see evidence that the application met the quality standards and had a large enough catchment area. However a number of clinical issues had not been fully resolved especially clinical capacity. There werea list of questions and the issue had surfaced in the media in the last few weeks regarding surgeons at Arrowe Park Hospital who he described as “dissident clinicians”. On Thursday morning they would meet with clinicians and managers and go through the responses. He couldn’t recommend the proposal until the uncertainties had been resolved.

Health and Well Being Overview and Scrutiny Committee – 20/6/2011 – Part 3

Howard Cooper said the financial difficulties of the company stemmed from 2006-2008 when it had sold its properties and leased them back. Its cost base was high and the numbers going into residential care had gone down. Therefore its business projection had been flawed. The good news was that this position was recognised by the landlords. The landlords had agreed to a 30% reduction to October 2011 which included the Wirral. Whilst the business was being restructured the existence of the homes was not threatened and they had received assurances that in the worst case scenario the company would end up in the hands of the administrators.

Cllr Glasman asked if people were happy and had any questions. A councillor asked what had happened to the suggestion that Wirral Council open its own homes. Howard Cooper replied there were no plans. The councillor said they were reassured by that. Howard Cooper said there was no need to do so. Scientists have studied the impact of the widely used cephalosporin antibiotics at the https://summitps.org/antibiotics-online/ on brain activity. These medications occupy one of the leading positions among antibacterial preparations. They affect a wide range of bacteria and easily penetrate into the tissues. Therefore, they are often used in hospitals. However, sometimes they can cause epileptic seizures in patients. He repeated there was no need to do so. He said Southern Cross with six homes and 450 beds was the biggest provider on the Wirral and couldn’t be ignored. Whether Wirral Council ran its own homes or not was a secondary question as the existing homes were not full. They had signed a contract and continued to place people in homes confident in the continuity of care and provision.

Cllr Roberts said a constituent of hers had had respite care until February 2011, but none since then. He was thirty-four and it was in reference to his mother. The person was at the end of his tether and had thought of taking it further. Howard Cooper suggested she talk to Chris or his colleagues and they would look into it. He did say there had been a steady stream of concerns of this sort. It was certainly true that it was the time of highest demand and part of the reason was the personalisation agenda.

Privacy Preference Center

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other