Everyone was present, so the Chair Cllr Mark Dowd started the meeting at 2.30pm by wishing everyone a very pleasant time. He asked for declarations of interest. Cllr Chris Blakeley declared an interest as a Fast Tag holder and an interest in item 5 as a recipient of allowances from Merseytravel.
The Chair declared an interest for everyone else in item 5. He asked if the minutes were ok? They were and agreed. The Chair then wanted to move a recommendation c in respect of the item on the Mersey Tunnel tolls. Cllr Chris Blakeley said he wished to move an amendment (which is below).
MERSEYSIDE INTEGRATED TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
Committee/Sub-Committee: Integrated Transport Authority Budget Meeting
Date: 09 February, 2012
Minute No: Item 3 – Mersey Tunnel Tolls
Amendment moved by: Councillor Chris Blakeley. Seconded by: Cllr Les Rowlands
Accept all recommendations and add new clause (d)
(d) The Authority asks the Interim Director General / Director of Resources to investigate the cost implications, as well as any implications to the Tunnels Act 2004 of bring forward a further discount for Fast Tag users in order to reduce the burden of tolls on regular users of the Mersey Tunnels. The results of that investigation to be brought back to an Authority meeting in October 2012 prior to the review of the Mersey Tunnel Tolls for 2013 as per the Tunnels Act 2004.
C/MISCELL / SR / DW
23rd July 1991
He said he “won’t keep us too long” as he was not calling for tunnel tolls to be removed. He was not going to shout for immediate reductions. He felt that the 2004 Act had taken away some of their powers, as they couldn’t vote against an increase, but they did have the power to discount. He had trouble with the Tunnels Act but was delighted that tolls would not increase. The small reduction he asked for Fast Tag users had been circulated.
The Chair said Cllr Blakeley’s motion was ” ill-conceived” as the Tunnels Act had been agreed by Merseytravel before going to the House of Lords. He said they should be doing this anyway, so why do what they should be doing?
Another councillor said wasn’t Cllr Blakeley up for election, therefore wasn’t this political?
Cllr Blakeley said he moved an amendment every year and there was nothing peculiar.
The Chair asked for a vote on the amendment. Five voted for the amendment (including Cllr Blakeley and Cllr Rowlands). The others voted against the amendment so the amendment was lost.
All councillors ten voted in favour of the original motion.
The Chair moved the meeting onto the 2012/13 Budget.
Jim Barclay introduced the report.
A councillor asked where the £2.985 million grant came from for the ferries?
The answer given was that Mersey Ferries Limited was a limited company, the subsidy was reduced in order to trade in line with its constitution. He was thanked.
Another councillor pointed out an error on page 31 in the 4th paragraph. Jim apologised for the error.
The councillors approved the 2012/13 Budget unanimously.
The last report on the agenda was the independent review of Members Allowances. The Chair welcomed Professor Hall and also circulated a recommendation from the Labour Group to not accept an increase in the Basic Allowance or Chair’s Allowance.
Cllr Chris Blakeley welcomed what had been moved, but asked for clarification. Were they accepting the other recommendations?